Use of nickel in a lithium rich cathode material for suppressing gas evolution from the cathode material during a charge cycle and for increasing the charge capacity of the cathode material

ABSTRACT

Use of nickel in a cathode material of the general formula Li (4/3-2x/3-y/3-z/3)Ni x Co y Al z Mn(2/3-x/3-2y/3-2z/3)0 2  wherein x is greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.4; y is equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or less than 0.4; and z is equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or less than 0.05 for suppressing gas evolution during a charge cycle and/or increasing the charge capacity of the material.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2018/053657, filed Dec. 18, 2018, which claims the priority of United Kingdom Application No. 1721178.0, filed Dec. 18, 2017, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present invention relates to a set of electroactive cathode compounds. More specifically the present invention relates to the use of a set of high capacity nickel containing lithium rich cathode compounds.

BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

Conventional lithium ion batteries are limited in performance by the capacity of the material used to make the positive electrode (cathode). Lithium rich blends of cathode materials containing blends of nickel manganese cobalt oxide offer a trade-off between safety and energy density. It is understood that charge is stored in the transition metal cations within such cathode materials. It has been suggested that the capacity, and therefore energy density, of cathode materials could be significantly increased if charge could be stored on anions (for example oxygen) reducing the need for such high amounts of heavy transition metal ions. However, a challenge remains to provide a material that can rely on the redox chemistries of both the anions and cations to store charge, and withstand charge/discharge cycles without compromising the safety of the material, or causing undesired redox reactions which would break down the material.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In a first aspect, the present invention relates to the use of nickel in a cathode material of the general formula:

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3} - \frac{y}{3} - \frac{z}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Co}_{y}{Al}_{z}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3} - \frac{2y}{3} - \frac{2z}{3}})}O_{2}$

for suppressing gas evolution during a charge cycle.

In a particular embodiment of the use x is greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.4; y is equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or less than 0.4; and z is equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or less than 0.05.

In a second aspect, the present invention relates to the use of nickel in a cathode material of the general formula:

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3} - \frac{y}{3} - \frac{z}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Co}_{y}{Al}_{z}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3} - \frac{2y}{3} - \frac{2z}{3}})}O_{2}$

for increasing the charge capacity of the material.

In a particular embodiment of the use x is greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.4; y is equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or less than 0.4; and z is equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or less than 0.05.

It has been found that a compound with an improved capacity can be achieved by reducing the amount of excess lithium and increasing the amount of nickel. Nickel can thus be used to increase the capacity of the NMC-type cathode material. The particular compound as defined above exhibits a significantly large increase in capacity due to the degree of oxidation of the transition metal nickel and also the oxidation of the oxide ions within the lattice. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is understood that the presence of a particular amount of nickel substitution enables greater oxygen redox activity and thereby improves the electrochemical capacity of the material.

In addition, the compounds of the present invention exhibit improved stability during electrochemical cycling when compared to the transition metal substituted NMC lithium rich materials of the prior art. The evolution of molecular oxygen is ubiquitous with third row lithium-rich materials transition metal oxides where lithium has been exchanged for some of the transition metal ions (Li_(1+x)M_(1−x)O₂, where M is Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu or Zn). These materials generally rely on oxygen redox to improve their charge capacity properties.

Homogenous materials can suffer from molecular oxygen escaping from the crystal structure during cycling due to redox of the oxide anion. In turn, this reduces the capacity and useful lifetime of the material. However, the material of the present invention has improved capacity which is maintained over numerous cycles.

The gas may be molecular oxygen and/or carbon dioxide It is understood that when the charge imbalance caused by the removal of a lithium ion is balanced by the removal of an electron from the oxygen anion the resulting oxygen anion is unstable which results in undesired redox reactions and the evolution of molecular oxygen gas during charge cycling. Carbon dioxide may also be produced due to reactions of oxygen escaping from the lattice with the electrolytic solvent (e.g. propylene carbonate). Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is understood that the specific nickel content in the material relative to the lithium content avoids under-bonding within the lattice such that each oxygen anion is still bonded to ˜3 cations. A potential solution to this problem might be to encapsulate the cathode layer or part of the cell in a gas impermeable membrane. However, this would add parasitic mass to the cell, thereby reducing the energy density of the resulting battery. However, the chemical approach of the present invention tunes the structure of the lattice using specific amounts of transition metals reduces the generation of oxygen gas from the material without the need to add layers to the cathode material or resulting battery cell.

In a particular embodiment y and z are both equal to 0; and x is equal to or greater than 0.3 and equal to or less than 0.4. Thus, the cathode material may be selected from one of Li_(1.333)Ni_(0.3)Mn_(0.5667)O₂ or Li_(1.066)Ni_(0.4)Mn_(0.533)O₂

In a particular embodiment z is equal to 0; x is equal to 0.2; and y is equal to or greater than 0.15 and equal to or less than 0.2. Thus, the cathode material may be selected from one of Li_(1.1333)Co_(0.2)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.4667)O₂ or Li_(1.15)Co_(0.15)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.5)O₂.

In a particular embodiment x is equal to 0.2; z is equal to 0.05; and y is equal to or greater than 0.1 and equal to or less than 0.15. Thus, the cathode material may be selected from one of Li_(1.15)Ni_(0.2)Co_(0.1)Al_(0.05)Mn_(0.5)O₂ or Li_(1.333)Ni_(0.2)Co_(0.15)Al_(0.05)Mn_(0.4667)O₂.

These particular compounds have demonstrated a low gas evolution and an improved capacity for charge with good stability over a number of cycles.

The compound may be defined as having a layered structure. Typically layered structures have been shown to have the highest energy density. When in the layered form, the material can be further defined using the general formula (1-a-b-c)Li₂MnO₃.aLiCoO₂.bLiNioMn_(0.5)O₂.cLiAlO₂ such that a, b and c equate to values of the general formulae above.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, an embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying Figures, in which:

FIG. 1 shows powder X-ray Diffraction patterns of the synthesised materials according to Example 1a compared with the calculated patterns of the C12/m and R-3m symmetry lattice shown at the bottom and top of the figure respectively;

FIGS. 2A-2B shows powder X-ray Diffraction patterns of the synthesised materials according to Example 1b;

FIGS. 3A-3B shows powder X-ray Diffraction patterns of the synthesised materials according to Example 1c;

FIG. 4 shows first cycle galvanostatic load curves for the synthesised materials according to Example 1a;

FIGS. 5A-5B shows first cycle galvanostatic load curves for the synthesised materials according to Example 1b;

FIGS. 6A-6B shows first cycle galvanostatic load curves for the synthesised materials according to Example 1c;

FIGS. 7A-7C shows OEMS analysis of the nickel doped Li₂MnO₂ materials; and

FIG. 8 shows OEMS analysis of one of the materials according to the Example 1c.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present invention will now be illustrated with reference to the following examples.

Example 1—Synthesis of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

1a) The Formaldehyde-Resorcinol sol gel synthetic route was employed to synthesise materials with general formula

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3}})}O_{2}$

with x=0, 0.06, 0.12, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 all the reagents ratios were calculated in order to obtain 0.01 mol of the final product.

Stoichiometric amounts of CH₃COOLi.2H₂O (98.0%, Sigma Aldrich®), (CH₃COO)₂Mn.4H₂O (>99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) and (CH₃COO)₂Ni.4H₂O (99.0% Sigma Aldrich® were dissolved in 50 mL of water with 0.25 mmol of CH₃COOLi.2H₂O (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) corresponding to 5% moles of lithium with respect to the 0.01 moles of synthesized material. At the same time 0.1 mol of resorcinol (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) was dissolved in 0.15 mol of formaldehyde (36.5% w/w solution in water, Fluka®). Once all the reagents were completely dissolved in their respective solvents, the two solutions were mixed and the mixture was vigorously stirred for one hour. The resulting solution, containing 5% molar excess of lithium, was subsequently heated in an oil bath at 80° C. until the formation of a homogeneous white gel.

The gel was finally dried at 90° C. overnight and then heat treated at 500° C. for 15 hours and 800° C. for 20 hours.

1b) For cobalt-containing cathode material doped with nickel, The Formaldehyde-Resorcinol sol gel synthetic route was employed to synthesise materials with general formula

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3} - \frac{y}{3}})}{Co}_{y}{Ni}_{x}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3} - \frac{2\; y}{3}})}O_{2}$

with a composition where x=0.2 y=0.2 (composition in FIGS. 2A and 5A) and with a composition w here x=0.2 y=0.15 (composition in FIGS. 2B and 5B). All the reagents ratios were calculated in order to obtain 0.01 mol of the final product.

Stoichiometric amounts of CH₃COOLi.2H₂O (98.0%, Sigma Aldrich®), (CH₃COO)₂Mn.4H₂O (>99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) (CH₃COO)₂Ni.4H₂O (99.0% Sigma Aldrich® and (CH₃COO)₂Co.4H₂O (99.0% Sigma Aldrich®) were dissolved in 50 mL of water with 0.25 mmol of CH₃COOLi.2H₂O (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) corresponding to 5% moles of lithium with respect to the 0.01 moles of synthesized material. At the same time 0.1 mol of resorcinol (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) was dissolved in 0.15 mol of formaldehyde (36.5% w/w solution in water, Fluka®). Once all the reagents were completely dissolved in their respective solvents, the two solutions were mixed and the mixture was vigorously stirred for one hour. The resulting solution, containing 5% molar excess of lithium, was subsequently heated in an oil bath at 80° C. until the formation of a homogeneous white gel.

The gel was finally dried at 90° C. overnight and then heat treated at 500° C. for 15 hours and 800° C. for 20 hours.

1c) For cobalt-aluminium-containing cathode material doped with nickel, the Formaldehyde-Resorcinol sol gel synthetic route was employed to synthesise materials with general formula

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3} - \frac{y}{3} - \frac{z}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Co}_{y}{Al}_{z}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3} - \frac{2y}{3} - \frac{2z}{3}})}O_{2}$

with a composition having x=0.2 y=0.15 z=0.05 (composition in FIGS. 3A and 6A); and with a composition having x=0.2 y=0.1 z=0.05 (composition in FIGS. 3B and 6B).

All the reagents ratios were calculated in order to obtain 0.01 mol of the final product.

Stoichiometric amounts of CH₃COOLi.2H₂O (98.0%, Sigma Aldrich®), (CH₃COO)₂Mn.4H₂O (>99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®), (CH₃COO)₂Co.4H₂O (99.0% Sigma Aldrich®), Al₂(SO₄)₃.4H₂O (Sigma Aldrich®) and (CH₃COO)₂Ni.4H₂O (99.0% Sigma Aldrich®) were dissolved in 50 mL of water with 0.25 mmol of CH₃COOLi.2H₂O (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) corresponding to 5% moles of lithium with respect to the 0.01 moles of synthesized material. At the same time 0.1 mol of resorcinol (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) was dissolved in 0.15 mol of formaldehyde (36.5% w/w solution in water, Fluka®). Once all the reagents were completely dissolved in their respective solvents, the two solutions were mixed and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 1 hour. The resulting solution, containing 5% molar excess of lithium, was subsequently heated in an oil bath at 80° C. until the formation of a homogeneous white gel.

The gel was finally dried at 90° C. overnight and then heat treated at 500° C. for 15 hours and 800° C. for 20 hours.

Example 2—Structural Analysis and Characterisation of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

The materials according to Example 1a-c were examined with Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD) which was carried out utilising a Rigaku® SmartLab equipped with a 9 kW Cu rotating anode; and MAS-NMR spectra were collected on the materials with a Bruker Avance III 400WD magnet.

FIGS. 1 (nickel doped Li₂MnO₂), 2A and 2B (nickel doped cobalt compositions 1 and 2, respectively) and 3A and 3B (nickel doped aluminum cobalt compositions 1 and 2, respectively) show Powder X-ray Diffraction patterns of the synthesized materials. These are characteristic of layered materials with some cation ordering in the transition layer. All of the patterns appear to show the major peaks consistent with a close-packed layered structure such as LiTMO₂ with a R-3m space group. Additional peaks are observed in the range 20-30 2Theta degrees which cannot be assigned to the R-3m space. The order derives from the atomic radii and charge density differences between Li⁺ (0.59 Å), Ni⁺² (0.69 Å) and Mn⁴⁺ (0.83 Å) and appears the strongest in the structures of the low nickel doped oxides. The peaks are not as strong as in materials where a perfect order exists as in Li₂MnO₃. No presence of extra-peaks due to impurities was observed.

Example 3—Electrochemical Analysis of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

The materials according to Example 1a-c were characterised electrochemically through galvanostatic cycling performed with a BioLogic VMP3 and a Maccor 4600 series potentiostats. All the samples were assembled into stainless steel coincells against metallic lithium and cycled between 2 and 4.8 V vs. Li⁺/Li for 100 cycles at a current rate of 50 mAg-1. The electrolyte employed was LP30 (a 1M solution of LiPF₆ in 1;1 w/w ratio of EC;DMC).

FIGS. 4, 5A-5B, and 6A-6B show the potential curves during the charge and subsequent discharge of the first cycle for each material according to Example 1.

FIG. 4 shows the potential curves during the charge and subsequent discharge of the first cycle for each material according to Example 1a. All of the samples present a high voltage plateau of different lengths centred on 4.5 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰, whereas the presence of a sloped region at the beginning of the charge progressively increases in length with the amount of nickel doping. The extension of this region may be attributed to the oxidation of nickel from Ni⁺² toward Ni⁺⁴. appears to be in good agreement with the amount of lithium (i.e. charge) that would be extracted accounting for solely the nickel redox activity. Hence, as expected, Li₂MnO₃ does not show any pre-plateau region whilst the

${{Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3}})}O_{2}\mspace{14mu} x} = 0.3$

doped oxide presents more than 150 mAhg⁻¹.

During the first discharge, none of the materials show the presence of a reversible plateau, indicating a difference in the thermodynamic pathways followed during the extraction (charge) and insertion (discharge) of lithium ions from/in the lattice of each sample.

For all the material according to Example 1a the first cycle presents the lowest coulombic efficiency value due to the presence of the high potential plateau which is not reversible. The coulombic efficiencies appear to quickly improve from the first cycle values, around 60-70%, to values higher than 98% within the first five cycles. However, with this regard Li₂MnO₃ and

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3}})}O_{2}$

with x=0.06 are an exception, showing an initial loss in efficiency. When the nickel substitution increases such that x=0.12 a significant improvement in the electrochemical performance is seen, indicating that there is a change in the nature of the charge storage mechanism.

FIGS. 5A-5B (nickel doped cobalt cathode materials) show the potential curves during the charge and subsequent discharge of the first cycle for materials according to Example 1b. Both samples present a high voltage plateau of different lengths centered on 4.5 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰, and a sloped region at the beginning of the charge. The length of this region may be attributed to the oxidation of nickel from Ni⁺² toward Ni⁺⁴ and Co⁺³ toward Co⁺⁴ and appears to be in good agreement with the amount of lithium (i.e. charge) that would be extracted accounting for solely the transition metal redox activity.

During the first discharge, neither material shows the presence of a reversible plateau, indicating a difference in the thermodynamic pathways followed during the extraction (charge) and insertion (discharge) of lithium ions from/in the lattice of each sample.

For the materials of Example 1b the first cycle presents the lowest coulombic efficiency value due to the presence of the high potential plateau which is not reversible. The coulombic efficiencies appear to quickly improve from the first cycle values, around 60-80%, to values higher than 98% within the first five cycles.

The materials according to Example 1c were characterised electrochemically through galvanostatic cycling performed with a BioLogic VMP3 and a Maccor 4600 series potentiostats. All the samples were assembled into stainless steel coincells against metallic lithium and cycled between 2 and 4.8 V vs. Li⁺/Li for 100 cycles at a current rate of 50 mAg-1. The electrolyte employed was LP30 (a 1M solution of LiPF6 in 1;1 w/w ratio of EC;DMC).

FIGS. 6A-6B show the potential curves during the charge and subsequent discharge of the first cycle for each material according to Example 1c. Both samples present a high voltage plateau of different lengths centered on 4.5 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰, and a sloped region at the beginning of the charge. The length of this region may be attributed to the oxidation of nickel from Ni⁺² toward Ni⁺⁴ and Co⁺³ toward Co⁺⁴ and appears to be in good agreement with the amount of lithium (i.e. charge) that would be extracted accounting for solely the transition metal redox activity.

During the first discharge, neither material shows the presence of a reversible plateau, indicating a difference in the thermodynamic pathways followed during the extraction (charge) and insertion (discharge) of lithium ions from/in the lattice of each sample.

For both materials according to Example 1c the first cycle presents the lowest coulombic efficiency value due to the presence of the high potential plateau which is not reversible. The coulombic efficiencies appear to quickly improve from the first cycle values, around 60-80%, to values higher than 98% within the first five cycles.

Example 4—Gas Evolution During the First Cycle of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

One pellet of material according to Example 1a was assembled into a Swagelok® test cell specifically machined to carry out an Operando Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry (OEMS) measurement. The mass spectrometry measurement involved in the OEMS experiment was performed with a Thermo-Fisher quadrupolar mass spectrometer. OEMS was performed on the set of materials in order to get an insight on the origin of the extra-capacity that is observed during the first cycle.

FIGS. 7A-7C show OEMS analysis of the nickel doped

${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2}{3x}})}{Ni}_{x}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{1}{3x}})}O_{2}$

for x=0.2, 0.3 and 0.4, respectively. Each graph shows the galvanostatic curve during the first two cycles (top lines in each graph), the oxygen trace, and the carbon dioxide trace for each material. The right y-axis represents the electrode potential while the left y-axis the gas release rate expressed as moles of gas per minute per mole of active material, both axis reported as function of lithium equivalents. Argon was used as carrier gas with a flux rate of 0.7 mL/min and the electrode was cycled against metallic lithium at a rate of 15 mAg⁻¹ between 2 and 4.8 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ for all the materials. The electrolyte employed was a 1M solution of LiPF₆ in propylene carbonate.

CO₂ and O₂ were the only gaseous species detected for all the samples and a clear trend appears from FIG. 4, with a progressively lower amount of gas released as the amount of dopant nickel increases.

CO₂ is detected first in all cases, peaking at the beginning of the high potential plateau (around 4.5 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰) region and progressively decreasing until the end of charge.

The amount of CO₂ decreases in line with the increase in nickel in content but is never eliminated. On the other hand, molecular oxygen appears to be released in a spike-like fashion that reaches its maximum towards the end of charge for the materials of the present invention. In the case of the high Ni substitution where x=0.4 it has been shown that there is almost complete suppression of O₂ and a strong reduction in the amount of detected CO₂ (FIG. 7C) This result is suggestive of the important role played by nickel as in stabilizing the oxide structures at high potentials by reducing the oxygen loss process.

One pellet of Composition 1 Li_(1.333)Co_(0.15)Al_(0.5)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.4667)O₂ (a composition from Example 1c) was assembled into a Swagelok® test cell specifically machined to carry out an Operando Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry (OEMS) measurement. The mass spectrometry measurement involved in the OEMS experiment was performed with a Thermo-Fisher quadrupolar mass spectrometer. OEMS was performed on the set of materials in order to get an insight on the origin of the extra-capacity that is observed during the first cycle.

FIG. 8 shows OEMS analysis of the nickel doped Li_(1.1333)Co_(0.15)Al_(0.05)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.4667)O₂ respectively. The graph shows the galvanostatic curve during the first two cycles (top graph), the oxygen trace, and the carbon dioxide trace for each material(bottom graph). Argon was used as carrier gas with a flux rate of 0.7 mL/min and the electrode was cycled against metallic lithium at a rate of 15 mAg-1 between 2 and 4.8 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ for all the materials. The electrolyte employed was a 1M solution of LiPF₆ in propylene carbonate.

CO₂ was the only gaseous species detected for all the samples and a progressively lower amount of gas released as the amount of dopant nickel increases. CO₂ peaks at the beginning of the high potential plateau (around 4.5 V vs. Li⁺/Li⁰) region and progressively decreasing until the end of charge. 

1. A method comprising: suppressing gas evolution from a cathode material during a charge cycle by incorporating nickel in a lithium rich cathode material of the general formula: ${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3} - \frac{y}{3} - \frac{z}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Co}_{y}{Al}_{z}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3} - \frac{2y}{3} - \frac{2z}{3}})}O_{2}$
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the gas is at least one of molecular oxygen and carbon dioxide.
 3. The method claim 1, wherein y and z are both equal to 0; and x is equal to or greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.12.
 4. The method claim 1, wherein y and z are both equal to 0; and x is equal to or greater than 0.3 and equal to or less than 0.4.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the cathode material is selected from one of Li_(1.1333)Ni_(0.3)Mn_(0.5667)O₂ or Li_(1.066)Ni_(0.4)Mn_(0.533)O₂.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein z is equal to 0; x is equal to 0.2; and y is equal to or greater than 0.15 and equal to or less than 0.2.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the cathode material is selected from one of Li_(1.1333)Co_(0.2)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.4667)O₂ or Li_(1.15)Co_(0.15)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.05)O₂.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein x is equal to 0.2; z is equal to 0.05; and y is equal to or greater than 0.1 and equal to or less than 0.15.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the cathode material is selected from one of Li_(1.15)Ni_(0.2)Co_(0.1)Al_(0.05)Mn_(0.5)O₂ or Li_(1.1333)Ni_(0.2)Co_(0.15)Al_(0.05)Mn_(0.4667)O₂.
 10. A method comprising: increasing the charge capacity of a cathode material by incorporating nickel in a lithium rich cathode material of the general formula: ${Li}_{({\frac{4}{3} - \frac{2x}{3} - \frac{y}{3} - \frac{z}{3}})}{Ni}_{x}{Co}_{y}{Al}_{z}{Mn}_{({\frac{2}{3} - \frac{x}{3} - \frac{2y}{3} - \frac{2z}{3}})}O_{2}$
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein y and z are both equal to 0; and x is equal to or greater than 0.3 and equal to or less than 0.4.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the cathode material is selected from one of Li_(1.1333)Ni_(0.3)Mn_(0.5667)O₂ or Li_(1.066)Ni_(0.4)Mn_(0.533)O₂.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein z is equal to 0; x is equal to 0.2; and y is equal to or greater than 0.15 and equal to or less than 0.2.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the cathode material is selected from one of Li_(1.1333)Co_(0.2)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.4667)O₂ or Li_(1.15)Co_(0.15)Ni_(0.2)Mn_(0.5)O₂.
 15. The method of claim 10, wherein x is equal to 0.2; z is equal to 0.05; and y is equal to or greater than 0.1 and equal to or less than 0.15.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the cathode material is selected from one of Li_(1.15)Ni_(0.2)Co_(0.1)Al_(0.05)Mn_(0.5)O₂ or Li_(1.1333)Ni_(0.2)Co_(0.15)Al_(0.05)Mn_(0.4667)O₂. 